European airlines: Environmental benefits limited in shift from air to rail
As pressure ramps up to increase global decarbonisation targets, transportation has come under increased scrutiny, especially aviation.
One solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport is a modal shift from air to rail.
This has already been tentatively encouraged by bans and taxes on short-haul flights in certain countries, with potentially more to follow.
However, a new study commissioned by European aviation associations claim a rail substitute for air travel offers limited benefits.
The report, ‘Short-haul flying and sustainable connectivity,’ highlights the fact that the picture is far more complex than simply shifting from one transport mode to another.
Building new railway lines has a high environmental cost due to the CO2 emissions associated with cement and steel production, and emissions from the fuel used for construction of infrastructure, it says.
The study also identifies significant impacts on biodiversity and damage to wildlife habitats as additional environmental factors.
For short-haul air routes with a lower traffic frequency, or at airports without a good high-speed rail connection, rail cannot be economically viable, the study finds.
It finds no evidence that passengers will automatically switch from air to rail, choosing to travel by car instead.
It claims aviation decarbonisation will be well underway by the time comparable rail infrastructure is deployed, citing hybrid-electric aircraft on regional routes by 2030,
The heads of the aviation associations want policymakers to take these environmental, social and economic factors into account before setting decarbonisation policy of regional transport in Europe.
EU airports bring back 100ml liquid rule
CLIA: Anti-cruise demos could cause itinerary changes in Europe
Co-pilot faints, easyJet flight issues ‘red alert’
Dozens fall ill in P&O Cruises ship outbreak
Woman dies after getting ‘entangled’ in baggage carousel