Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria Under Fire from Responsible Tourism Chief - TravelMole


Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria Under Fire from Responsible Tourism Chief

Sunday, 04 Feb, 2010 0

 

“The case for spending public money on certification has not been made.” Writes Professor Harold Goodwin of the International Centre for Responsible Tourism in his blog today.
 
He says: “In July I argued that the case for certification had not yet been made and said that I knew of no substantial evidence that certification delivers for the businesses which fund it or the public agencies which have subsidised and promoted it. I asked that if there was evidence that:
 
a) sustainable tourism certification increases the market share of businesses that adopt it, or that
b) there is consumer demand for certification, or that
c) the environmental impacts of tourism have been reduced and that tourism has consequently become more sustainable.
 
"No evidence has been forthcoming.” He says that in July he had 5 concerns and now 10:
 
  1. Concern that many of the impacts of tourism result from the behaviour of tourists, sustainable tourism cannot be reduced to managing the impacts of tourism businesses.
  2. There are no indicators or targets against which progress might be reported. It is all about policies, strategies and plans rather than defining targets and measuring the outcomes.
  3. The certification process is opaque. The customer does not know what has been achieved and cannot take any action about failures even if they did.
  4. The criteria are very many and varied and not ranked. There is no indication of how they might be varied to meet local concerns and priorities.
  5. There is no evidence that sustainable tourism certification is effective, or the best way, to increase the market share of businesses that adopt it. It does not make commercial sense.

T"hose who have signed the petition have raised a number of other issues with us and we are now including them in the campaign." The five further issues are as follows:

  1. Taking such a broad approach reduces focus and ignores local priorities. It can only result in a superficial approach and limited impact at the destination level. The GST Criteria approach can usefully be contrasted with the highly focussed efforts being pursued in Cape Town.
  2. There is a real danger that certification will be used to exclude or disadvantage those who cannot afford the certification process or to renew their membership.
  3. There is little evidence of private sector engagement unless subsidised. Indeed there is considerable evidence that businesses do not renew their subscriptions when they have to pay them themselves.
  4. The approach seeks to impose supranational priorities over national and local ones.
  5. Once again tourism is developing a solution which appears to be unrelated to the established international processes.
 
He calls for the GSTC to engage in a more open debate about the criteria which they are promoting and the process which they had used to determine those criteria.”80 people have now signed our online petition calling for an open debate.”
 
He says that $200,000 has already been committed to GSTC and that the new initiative will cost $1.2m plus
 
There are four key reasons, says Prof Goodwin, why the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria will fail:
  1. We know of no evidence of consumer demand. It is not sufficient to argue that it has created consumer demand in other sectors so it will work in tourism. There have been hundreds of certification schemes none of them have effectively created consumer demand; this is not surprising since the consumer benefit is unclear. What is the experiential gain?
  2. All tourism has local impacts (except for green house gas emissions) the impacts need to be identified, prioritised and managed locally. There is no global certification scheme for hotel room quality which is an inherently simpler task.
  3. There is good reason for this; the world’s diversity precludes it. There is no case for one global set of priorities; any international accreditation scheme requires this. Tourism is a much more complex product than timber and the take up rates are still low there.
  4. Only by creating a long “wish list” of criteria is it possible to encompass the diversity of issues which are of local concern, there is a very real danger of failing to deliver anything other than a wish list and of failing to identify and prioritise those issues which matter in a particular place.
 
 
Valere Tjolle

 



 

profileimage

Valere



Most Read

Mark Jaronski of Explore Georgia on FIFA World Cup 2026

Connecting Small Businesses to Global Tourism Markets: Nate Huff of Tourism Exchange

North Carolina’s Resilience: Wit Tuttell on Recovery and Tourism

Kittipong Prapattong’s Plan for Thailand’s Tourism Growth: Taxes, Visas, and Campaigns

James Jin: Didatravel’s Journey from China to Global Reach and the Impact of AI on Travel

Darien Schaefer on Pensacola’s Evolution: From Small Town to Global Destination

Florida Tourism’s Next Frontier: Dana Young on Expanding Beyond the Classics

Patrick Harrison on Tampa Bay Tourism’s Resilience and Marketing Strategy

Bubba O’Keefe on Clarksdale’s Vibrant Music Scene

Commemorating Elvis and Embracing Tupelo’s Culture with Jennie Bradford Curlee

Craig Ray and the Expansion of the Blues Trail

Presenting Mississippi’s Cultural Trails with Katie Coats
TRAINING & COMPETITION

Our emails to you has bounced travelmole.com Or You can change your email from your profile Setting Section

Your region selection will be saved in your cookie for future visits. Please enable your cookie for TravelMole.com so this dialog box will not come up again.

Price Based Country test mode enabled for testing United States (US). You should do tests on private browsing mode. Browse in private with Firefox, Chrome and Safari