United Kingdom
United States
Asia Pacific
Govt urged to put consumers at heart of airline insolvency review
ABTA has responded to the Government’s announcement outlining the airline insolvency review, saying customers must come first.
The review was announced up following the demise of Monarch last year.
Chief executive Mark Tanzer said: "Reviewing what happens to passengers when an airline goes out of business is a welcome and necessary step by the government.
"ABTA has long-argued that consumer protection hasn’t kept pace with the changing ways in which people can book travel and that there is a need for greater clarity around consumer protection for businesses and consumers alike.
"Many travellers are unaware that if you book a flight directly with an airline you are not protected if the company goes out of business, but if the flight is booked as part of a package or flight-plus, you are.
"The current system is not clear for passengers or the industry, and is inconsistent in its application.
"The Government will need to put consumers at the heart of the review in order to make sure that the outcome delivers the right protection and clarity for passengers and industry. We look forward to contributing to the review."
Under the current system, Package Travel Regulations mean that if an airline fails the tour operator will have to arrange repatriation or a refund.
The ATOL scheme ensures that customers who buy flight-based packages or flight-plus arrangements will be repatriated or refunded if their package organiser fails.
Some flight-only sales are also currently protected, when sold through travel agents or intermediaries. However, it is unclear whether this protection will remain in place following implementation of the revised Package Travel Directive which comes into force on July 1.
ATOL protection does not apply to everything a company sells, it applies to a particular set of travel arrangements.
Companies must, under current law, advertise themselves as ATOL protected – even if the majority of travel arrangements they operate are not protected by the scheme. This can lead to consumers thinking their travel arrangement is protected when it isn’t.
Currently travel companies in ATOL pay £2.50 per passenger to fund the protection scheme.
In October last year, the Government brought home 110,000 customers following the collapse of the Monarch travel company, even though the vast majority of customers were not covered by the company’s ATOL licence.
Lisa
Lisa joined Travel Weekly nearly 25 years ago as technology reporter and then sailed around the world for a couple of years as cruise correspondent, before becoming deputy editor. Now freelance, Lisa writes for various print and web publications, edits Corporate Traveller’s client magazine, Gateway, and works on the acclaimed Remembering Wildlife series of photography books, which raise awareness of nature’s most at-risk species and helps to fund their protection.
Mark Jaronski of Explore Georgia on FIFA World Cup 2026
Connecting Small Businesses to Global Tourism Markets: Nate Huff of Tourism Exchange
North Carolina’s Resilience: Wit Tuttell on Recovery and Tourism
Kittipong Prapattong’s Plan for Thailand’s Tourism Growth: Taxes, Visas, and Campaigns
James Jin: Didatravel’s Journey from China to Global Reach and the Impact of AI on Travel
Darien Schaefer on Pensacola’s Evolution: From Small Town to Global Destination
Florida Tourism’s Next Frontier: Dana Young on Expanding Beyond the Classics
Patrick Harrison on Tampa Bay Tourism’s Resilience and Marketing Strategy
Bubba O’Keefe on Clarksdale’s Vibrant Music Scene
Commemorating Elvis and Embracing Tupelo’s Culture with Jennie Bradford Curlee
Craig Ray and the Expansion of the Blues Trail
Presenting Mississippi’s Cultural Trails with Katie Coats
BA suspending all Heathrow to Abu Dhabi flights
Turkish Airlines flight in emergency landing after pilot dies
Unexpected wave rocks cruise ship
Woman dies after going overboard in English Channel
Foreign Office issues travel advisory for winter sun destinations