Hotels4U loses over £120,000 in social media campaign - TravelMole


Hotels4U loses over £120,000 in social media campaign

Thursday, 25 Apr, 2012 0

Thomas Cook-owned Hotels4U suspended an ill-thought out one-day discount campaign after losing more than £120,000 within the first few hours of the launch.

 

The company told the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) that it had grossly underestimated the amount of bookings it would attract via the promotion on social media sites Facebook and Twitter.

 

Launched to persuade people to book on Christmas Day, the campaign offered users £50 off hotel bookings made that day. Hotels4U had anticipated about 570 bookings – 10 times more than on December 25 2010 – but it had attracted more than 2,600 by 6.30 am on Christmas Day.

 

As the majority of these had a sales value of less than £10 after applying the £50 discount, Hotels4U had generated a loss of £120,000.

 

At 7am it suspended the promotion to investigate why so many bookings had been made so quickly and at such a loss.

 

By 10am, it found that "a significant" number of customers had made duplicate bookings, in breach of the terms and conditions of the promotion" and it suspected that a large number of the bookings, which had been made before 7am by individuals living in the Far East, were fraudulent.

 

The promotion was reinstated at 11am but during the following hour a further 1,000 bookings were made. Hotels4U said it could not continue to operate the promotion for the remainder of the day in view of the level of booking activity, the number of duplicate or fraudulent bookings and the potential financial losses to the company, and they therefore closed the promotion early.

 

Hotels4U said it did not believe it was viable to implement measures to prevent multiple bookings for the purposes of a one-day promotion, since the time and cost involved in altering the website booking system "would have far outweighed any financial benefits gained from the promotion".

 

The ASA investigated following complaints from 19 customers who had tried to redeem their vouchers but found the promotion had ended early.

 

Hotels4U said it regretted ending the promotion early, but believed it had no alternative. However, the ASA upheld the complaint, saying that the number of fraudulent or duplicate bookings did not justify ending the promotion early. It ordered the company to take care future promotions are administered fairly and not to end them early "unless under circumstances outside their reasonable control".

 

By Linsey McNeill



 

profileimage

Linsey McNeill

Editor Linsey McNeill has been writing about travel for more than three decades. Bylines include The Times, Telegraph, Observer, Guardian and Which? plus the South China Morning Post. She also shares insider tips on thetraveljournalist.co.uk



Most Read

Tony from Gatto’s Pizza on Columbus’s Unique Pizza Trail

Sophia Hyder Hock on Global Social Inclusion in Tourism

Sustainable Tourism: Don Welsh on Community Values and Global Collaboration

Jane Cunningham: Enhancing European Engagement in Tourism

Kristin Dunne: Navigating Destination Strategy

Revolutionizing Mobile Connectivity: Boris Bijlstra on HUBBY eSIM

Capturing Glasgow’s Vibrancy: An Interview with Susan Deighan, Chief Executive of Glasgow Life

Lebua Hotel & Resorts: Rajan Khurana on Hospitality and Bangkok’s Charms

Sustainable Tourism and Growth: Insights from Chiravadee Khunsub from Tourism Authority of Thailand

Revolutionizing Travel: SmartSIM USA’s Dale Takio Unveils the Power of E Sims

TravelMole Interview with Hishan Singhawansa, Deputy CEO of Cinnamon Hotels & Resorts, Sri Lanka

Unveiling the Essence of Magari Tours: A Dive into Authentic Italian Experiences
TRAINING & COMPETITION

Our emails to you has bounced travelmole.com Or You can change your email from your profile Setting Section

Your region selection will be saved in your cookie for future visits. Please enable your cookie for TravelMole.com so this dialog box will not come up again.

Price Based Country test mode enabled for testing United States (US). You should do tests on private browsing mode. Browse in private with Firefox, Chrome and Safari