When ChatGPT goes rogue: Airline lawsuit in tatters after lawyer tricked by AI
A lawyer sought help from ChatGPT to bolster an airline lawsuit injury claim.
It backfired spectacularly with the lawyer now facing sanctions.
Lawyer Steven A. Schwartz, leading a claim against airline Avianca, submitted a brief based on ChatGPT research.
From a prompt, the AI listed three previous precedent cases – but they turned out to be fictional.
When reviewing the brief, Avianca’s lawyers found they didn’t exist.
The bogus cases were titled Martinez v. Delta Air Lines, Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines and Varghese v. China Southern Airlines.
“It seemed clear when we didn’t recognize any of the cases that something was amiss,” Avianca’s lawyer Bart Banino said.
Passenger Roberto Mata sued Avianca last year, claiming a food cart injured his knee during a US bound flight.
In an affidavit Schwartz admitted he had ‘consulted ChatGPT to supplement’ his research.
ChatGPT was ‘a source that has revealed itself to be unreliable,’ he said.
Schwartz and his law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman could face sanctions.
Ironically, ChatGPT passed the bar exam recently, with a score in the top 10%.
It has also aced several professional medical and accountancy exams.
Read Full StoryRelated News Stories:
TravelMole Editorial Team
Editor for TravelMole North America and Asia pacific regions. Ray is a highly experienced (15+ years) skilled journalist and editor predominantly in travel, hospitality and lifestyle working with a huge number of major market-leading brands. He has also cover in-depth news, interviews and features in general business, finance, tech and geopolitical issues for a select few major news outlets and publishers.
BA pilot dies during layover
Dozens fall ill in P&O Cruises ship outbreak
Turkish Airlines flight in emergency landing after pilot dies
Boy falls to death on cruise ship
Protestors now targeting Amsterdam cruise calls